The actual Underground society formula is straightforward to understand:
1. Manufacture the Crisis
two. Present the solution
Through MK-Ultra and other programming, the shadow federal government can manufacture Middle Eastern searching terrorists all day every day. MK-Ultra isn't technology fictional, it's a well-documented fact that had been exposed in Congressional Hearings. The Underground society possess lengthy wanted to pit Islam towards Western Christianity in a worldwide turmoil that would lead to the actual mass extermination of each organizations. It's all part of their own 90% population reduction plan.
The issue, because they view it, is their are usually a lot of lambs and not enough shepards. Too many slaves and never enough masters. Their preferred percentage is actually 10 slaves to one Satanic Psychopath. The objective would be to minimize the chances that we "get smart" in good sized quantities and rise against our Satanic Overlords.
The latest "Manchurian Candidate" served 2 objectives:
one. Irritate Christian believers towards Moslems.
2. Introduce mass surveillance in to america.
Within typical Illuminati fashion, anyone that criticizes mass surveillance will be branded a enemy sympathizer that's callous to the safety associated with others. This comes back towards the concept of regardless of whether you want manufactured security or Constitutional Independence. Innocent until Confirmed Guilty or even Guilty until proven innocent.
Back in the day that law enforcement would need to show "probable cause" to violate your own to privateness. Wire taps, video recorders and other surveilance only came due to a Court order. Actually, Richard Nixon lost his job for unlawful surveillance associated with his political competition on the Watergate hotel.
But, here may be the crucial point:
"With the bombing of four areas on 7 July 2005 in london, that is generally recognized just about the most seriously surveilled cities on the planet, the regrettable accuracy of our assertion was once more shown: in spite of the existence of around 500,000 surveillance digital cameras for the reason that town, most of them installed in the actual wake up from the IRA bombings from the early 1990s, four totally undeterred terrorists trigger tanks which wiped out over 50 people as well as wounded 700 more. The actual Emperor is actually wearing absolutely no clothes and now many people observe his nakedness." (supply)
I've read reviews which fine detail the way the cameras were easily "disabled" by intelligence hackers prior to the 7/7 bombings. Therefore, the one thing we would almost all like to observe, a real reside cleverness operation which implicates our Politicians in manufacturing terror, won't ever be recorded in the first place. (source)
Another just to illustrate is the 9/11 Government bombing where all of the private video monitoring videos had been repossesed through the Federal bureau of investigation (Citgo gas station next door for example) and will never begin to see the gentle associated with time. We should also ask about the african american container recordings which were additionally conveniently lost within Ron Brown's airplane freeze and the 9/11 episodes. Funny how several document passports endure, although not the actual black containers.
Through Arnold Kling, the columnist at Tech Main Station, 29 July 2005:
"The ability to repeat the terrorist incident after the truth doesn't excite me. It would do nothing at all to deter the suicide enemy. My guess is that it does little in order to prevent actually terrorists who wish to reside after -- they know they are playing a high-risk online game.
Like a avoidance tool, security cameras are of questionable value. Do human beings need to monitor the actual digital cameras 24/7? At best, digital cameras can use face-recognition technologies to problem some kind of alert, like, "there's a chap on our watch checklist, about to board the actual subway." Is such info timely and actionable?
It seems to me it would make more sense in order to choose network of devices which registers explosive devices than a network of digital cameras. A sensor which tries to detect explosives is less of a risk to privateness than the usual video camera. And a good reading from such a indicator would be a lot more actionable." (Source)
Therefore, when they aren't effective, so why do the actual politicians as well as their puppet experts want us to llive in a "surveillance society"? The answer ought to appear apparent to people that truly see what is going on in the world:
one. They've taken our wealth with the Government Book rip-off and the 1000 trillion dollar monetary derivatives rip-off. Actual prosperity is within gold and silver as well as ours is long gone.
two. The actual collapse from the middle class may result in massive protests and also the development of political competitors they can't manage. So, cameras may identify political opponents prior to they turn out to be a problem and they may then end up being removed. Think when it comes to somebody grabbing the "soapbox" in a Public Place to denounce the current routine. Or someone putting up a poster or giving out booklets.
3. You could be identified as a dissident based on the fender label or perhaps a T-shirt a person put on. Or, the actual books you are carrying.
Therefore, exactly what can be achieved at this time you ask? Allow me to propose the following:
one. Prosecute them with regard to "Invasion associated with Privacy". Flood the legal courts along with issues that these digital cameras are a gross attack
of the privateness. Allow it to be financially and socially unfeasible via law suit.
More: http://stop-bigbrother.blogspot.com/
and http://www.moneyteachers.org/Deadmanmusings1.htm
Listen to Paul Drockton Radio: http://www.moneyteachers.org/Radio.htm
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)